Last Monday,
June 10th, Regent Park gathered to discuss the revitalization plans.
The City of Toronto Department of Planning and Toronto Community Housing
Corporation (TCHC) held a consultation with the community on the recent
development plan amendments proposed by TCHC. The turnout for the consultation
was impressive, with the entire Ada Slaight Hall auditorium in the Daniels
Spectrum building nearly filled to capacity.
The topic
of the consultation was the following changes to the development plan for
Regent Park proposed by TCHC:*
- Increase from 5,400 to 7,500 social and
market housing units at the completion of all phases
- Increase the projected population from 12,500
to approximately 17,000 at the completion of all phases
- Removal of two small parkettes replaced by a new
larger park/sports field and adjustment to permitted land use
designations, blocks and streets proposed to reflect
reconfigurations of park spaces
- Addition of commercial parking garage as a
permitted use
- Demolition of heritage listed 14 Blevins
building and proposal for a 60m tower on this block
- Increase of building heights in some
locations including but not limited to:
- Two additional 88m towers on Dundas St E
(Phase 3)
- One new 120m tower on Parliament Street
(Phase 4)
- Sites on north side of central park and site
on River Street – currently permitted at 22m & 30m, proposed
increase to 50m
* (From the City website: visit http://www.toronto.ca/planning/regentpark.htm)
Not
expressed in this list of amendments is the population proportional change that
would occur with the construction of additional market housing units. The
proposed plan amendments shift the population proportion from an approximate
60-40% split to a proposed 75-25% split -- owners to renters. (Though TCHC
maintains a consistent 50-50% split as, for example, a house of TCHC residents
with two adults and three children would be counted as equal to five single-dwelling
market housing units). Though residents in attendance vocalised their concerns
about the proposed changes, the focus of apprehension was on the height of the
proposed towers rather than the proportional shift in population mix.
Specific unease was expressed over the proposed
height of a tower to be built on the corner of Gerrard and Parliament (120
metres). Residents had a number of concerns about its height, including
blocking sunlight in surrounding buildings, contrasting with the historical
architecture of the area, increasing density/traffic in an already congested
corner, and once again secluding Regent Park as an insular and inward-facing island.
According to the City representatives, John Gladki and Angela Stea, anxiety
around the buildings height had been vocalized prior to the consultation.
Throughout the consultation, the audience was reassured that the community’s
displeasure would be noted and addressed in the next planning stages.
The new proposed
tower heights
|
Others
noted concerns around amenities being able to support the population influx,
and what this increase would mean for access to programming. In response, it
was noted that the increased green space in the plan amendments should
hopefully provide more programming opportunities. It was also noted that
strained access to City facilities is a challenge all across Toronto, and that
this drawback is difficult to avoid.
Besides the new athletic field, the most welcome plan amendment proposed was clearly the demolition of the tower at 14 Blevins Place. Residents came out to voice their support for its deconstruction, offering poignant examples of the challenges faced daily for those residing in the dilapidated heritage building.
TCHC
Chief Development Officer, Greg Spearn, represented TCHC at the consultation,
and spoke about the rationale behind amendments to the development plan. Spearn
cited deficits, specifically miscalculations on the district energy system, and
desire for early completion of the development as reasons for the increase in
market unit builds. For some this did not justify the changes proposed, but for
all it seemed clear that compromise will have to be made by all parties in
order for Revitalization to continue.
For more
information on these proposed changes and the process for approval, please
visit www.toronto.ca/planning/regentpark.htm.
No comments:
Post a Comment